Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, Meters., and you will Scontras, Grams. (2015). The latest differential sign regarding matter and you may sex for the Spanish. Linguist. Rev. thirty two, 703–737.
Hartsuiker, R., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and Kikstra, G. Yards. (2003). Morphophonological affects towards design out of topic-verb contract. Mem. Cogn. 29, 1316–1326.
Heycock, C., and you may Zamparelli, Roentgen. (2005). Family unit members and you will associates: plurality, dexterity, additionally the design out-of DP. Nat. Lang. 13, 201–270.
Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and Rubia, F. (2003). Parallels and differences between phrase structure and you can morphosyntactic violations in the Foreign-language: an event-related potentials study. Lang. Cogn. Process. 18, 113–142.
Igoa, J. Yards., Garcia-Albea, J. E., and you will Sanches-Casas, Roentgen. (1999). Gender-matter dissociation for the sentence creation inside the Foreign-language. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 163–196.
Krstev, C., and you can Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you can Lexicon – Common Incompletness,” during the Procedures of the Corpus Linguistics Fulfilling, eds P. Danielsson and you may Yards. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.
Malko, A good., and Slioussar, N. (2013). “Destination problems in the gender agreement: Proof out of Russian,” during the Procedures Official Ways to Slavic Linguistics: The 3rd Indiana Meeting, eds S. Franks, mais aussi al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan College Drive), 162–175.
). “Last conjunct contract inside the Slovenian,” into the Proceedings out-of Official Ways to Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, Yards. Goledzinowska, and you will U. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic ukrainian ladies to marry Publications), 210-227.
Mitic, I., and you will Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Architectural ambiguity and you can optionality regarding arrangement models into the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct arrangement. A beneficial J. Gen. Linguist. 4:6.
Nevins, An effective., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and you can Phillips, C. (2007). The fresh new role out-of element-amount and feature-enter in control Hindi verb contract abuses. Mind Res. 1164, 81–94.
Puskar, Z., and Murphy, A great. (2015). “Nearest conjunct contract from inside the serbo-croatian: a guideline-buying membership,” when you look at the Information in the InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. ninety five, eds Good. Assmann, S. Bank, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and Elizabeth. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.
Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., and you will Garrett, Meters. F. (1996). Subject-verb arrangement for the Language and you will English: variations in this new role out-of conceptual limits. Cognition 61, 261–298.
Semant
Willer-Silver, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Meters., Becker, Meters., Cordalija, N., Kresic, M., mais aussi al. (2018). When linearity is out there more ladder in the sentence structure. PNAS 115, 495–five-hundred. doi: /pnas.1712729115
The fresh new five logically you’ll be able to combinations and their qualities is depicted in (21)
Willer-Silver, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Yards., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Yards., Leko, Letter., et al. (2016). Morphosyntactic creation of dexterity contract in the Southern Slavic–a comparative data. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 187–224.
It point explains certain technical concerns about the options produced in the design of all of our try out, inside white of unique properties from South carolina morphology. It’s lined up primarily of these looking new theoretic and you will descriptive linguistic, instead of psycholinguistic areas of the study.
In our experimental construction, i’ve capitalized to the proven fact that into the Sc NSg nouns avoid in a choice of -elizabeth or perhaps in -o, which their plural results in -a, whenever you are at the same time FSg nouns lead to -a good, as well as their plural variations bring about -e. Which production an effective entered, yet , incomplete syncretism.
The blend regarding NSg and you will FPl makes it possible for the forming of minimal pairs anywhere between an effective syncretic and you can a non-syncretic pair of nouns, as combination of NPl and you will FSg allows for one chance, that’s syncretic.
I made use of restricted pairs as in (20a) within our crucial stimulus. The new chosen alternative, however, allows several sub-selection, dependent on and that sex–count consolidation arrives given that first, and you can hence while the last conjunct. This was determined by several other comparable consideration.
The latest verb holds the fresh new endings: -o to possess NSg, -a towards NPl and you will FSg, otherwise -elizabeth getting FPl – i.elizabeth., you are able to distinguish NSg regarding FPl toward verb. As a result, besides the unambiguously standard male end -i, whenever an effective verb from inside the -elizabeth is brought, we were certain that it actually was FPl, and if an effective verb inside the -o try lead, i knew it absolutely was NSg. But not, whenever a great verb for the -a was delivered – it had been undecided in the event it is plural, agreeing during the gender towards very first conjunct (NPl), or it was only one and you may conformed for the sex into the past conjunct (FSg).