Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. G., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Progression and you will People Decisions, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place of accessory when you look at the peoples mating. Report about General Therapy, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Websites contradiction revisited. Log out of Societal Activities, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, R., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites paradox: A personal technology one to decreases social wedding and psychological well-are? Western Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
The benefits of self-confident illusions: Idealization plus the design off fulfillment inside close matchmaking
Kreider, R.M., & Fields, J. Yards. (2001). Number, timing, and lifetime of marriage ceremonies and you may divorces. Latest Society Account, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: U.S. Census Agency, 2005).
Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional analysis off closeness, welfare, and you will connection: Research the brand new presumptions of your triangular concept away from like. Mental Profile, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.3.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, E. (2004). Impact top about creating worse: Public evaluations within this romantic dating. Log out-of Identity and you can Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. Good., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Journal out of Identification and Public Mindset, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: The newest implicit cognition out-of personal competition
Maner, J. K., zoosk vs okcupid Rouby, D. A great., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automated inattention so you can attractive options: This new advanced therapy regarding dating repair. Evolution and you will Peoples Choices, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential investigation away from conflict and you will accord from inside the disappointed and nondistressed relationship lovers. Record from Contacting and you may Systematic Therapy, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Environmentally friendly, An effective. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking formation on line: What’s the larger interest? Record from Personal Points, 58(1), 9�29.
Neff, L. An effective., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-analysis intentions in intimate relationships: A style of globally enhancement and you can specific verification. Into the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Expertise ents on the examination of pair correspondence (pp. 32�58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the customer-specialist bond through the contact out of attachment idea. Psychotherapy: Principle, Lookup, Habit, Studies, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh societal keeping track of program: Enhanced sensitiveness to social signs because the an adaptive a reaction to societal exclusion. From inside the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), New public outcast: Ostracism, public exemption, getting rejected, and you may intimidation (pp. 213�226). New york, NY: Psychology Press.
Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Globally and you can specific relational designs in the connection with public relationships. Log of Character and Societal Therapy, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. Good., Tran, S., ). Connection and you can pointers seeking within the intimate dating. Personality and you will Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. Roentgen., & Spinner, B. (2001). General and you may particular accessory representations in the adulthood: Will there be a romance?. Log Regarding Societal And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A great. (2001)mitment and you can relationship repairs elements. In the J. Harvey & Good. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate intimate dating: Fix and you may enhancement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A great. D. (2000). Projection individually impact certainly spouses due to the fact a purpose of the fresh similarity in their shared skills. Identification And you will Social Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience away from extrinsic benefits to the taste and you can enjoying. Journal off Character and you can Societal Mindset, 38(3), 453�460.